Article by Shailja Agrahary
The Equalisation Levy was initially introduced in India in 2016 under the Finance Act, 2016. It refers to the tax imposed on the consideration received or receivable for specified services, e-commerce supplies, or services. This levy is set at a rate of 6% on the amount of consideration received by a Non-Resident for the specified services provided.
Subsequently, the Finance Act of 2020 brought amendments in the Finance Act 2016 by introducing a new Section 165A. This addition expanded the scope of the Equalisation Levy. Under this new provision, the Equalisation Levy is now applied at a rate of 2% on the consideration received or receivable by an e-commerce operator from an e-commerce supply or services provided to specified persons.
As mentioned above, Equalisation Levy shall be charged @6% of the amount of consideration received or receivable by the Non-Resident for the specified services rendered.
The Following conditions must be met for charging of Equalisation Levy under section-165 of the Act.
Equalisation Levy shall not be charged if,
As mentioned above, Equalisation Levy shall be charged @2% of the amount of consideration received or receivable by an e-commerce operator for e-commerce supply or services made or provided.
The Following conditions must be met for charging of Equalisation Levy under section-165A of the Act.
Equalisation Levy shall not be charged if,
Collection and Recovery of Equalisation Levy under Section 166 of the Finance Act, 2016 for the specified services.
It is the responsibility of every person being a resident in India and carrying business or profession or a non-resident person having permanent establishment in India to deduct Equalisation levy at the rate as specified under section 165 and shall deposit the same to the Central Government by the 7th day of the following month in which it was deducted. A person who fails to deposit the same within time shall pay the simple interest at the rate of 1% of such levy for every month or part of the month.
An Assessee shall pay the Equalisation levy to the Central Government as deducted under section 165A in the following manner. In case of failure, he is required to pay simple interest at the rate of 1% of such levy for every month or part of the month.
Serial Number | Quarter Ended of Financial Year | Due Date of Deposit |
1 | 30th June | 7th July |
2 | 30th September | 7th October |
3 | 31st December | 7th January |
4 | 31st March | 31st March |
Every E-commerce operator shall furnish the statement electronically to the Assessing Officer in respect of specified services or e-commerce supply or services during the financial year on or before 30th June immediately following the financial year. Such statement shall be furnish in Form No. 1 as per Rule 5 of Equalisation Levy Rules, 2016. Failure to furnish such statement will result in penalty of Rs. 100 for each day during which the failure continue.
Krishna Ltd, an Indian company engaged in the manufacturing and trading of shoes, aimed to boost its export sales by launching an extensive advertising campaign in the international market. For online advertising, the company enlisted the services of Google Inc, a USA-based company having no permanent establishment in India. In the fiscal year 2021-22, Krishna Ltd paid Rs. 30 lakhs for these services. Let’s discuss the tax and TDS implications for both Krishna Ltd and Google Inc.
According to the tax regulations, an Equalisation Levy is applicable at a rate of 6% on the consideration exceeding Rs. 1 lakh received by a non-resident entity having no permanent establishment in India. In this scenario, the payment is made by Krishna Ltd, an Indian resident engaged in business or profession, to Google Inc, a non-resident company having no permanent establishment in India, for the provision of online advertising services.
This transaction falls under the purview of Equalisation Levy at a rate of 6%, as outlined in Section 165 of the Finance Act, 2016. Consequently, Krishna Ltd is obligated to deduct an Equalisation Levy of Rs. 1.8 lakhs, which is 6% of the Rs. 30 lakhs paid to Google Inc for its online advertising services.
Article by Vijay K Singh & Himanshu Dubey “Sometimes, in quest of justice we end…
Article by Sarthak Tripathi Introduction In an unusual turn of events, a Spanish criminal court…
Article by Khushboo Tomar Mangal Trademark anti-counterfeiting strategies in India adopt a comprehensive approach that…
Article by Jyoti Lakhoria Introduction Companies place a great deal of importance on their goodwill…
Article by Kabir Chaturvedi & Kopal Chaturvedi Confidentiality in arbitration serves as both a shield…
Article by Ankur Mishra & Akash Singh Introduction Under Section 29A of the Arbitration and…